An icebreaker
A psychiatrist argues the brain's two hemispheres don't just handle different tasks but offer two fundamentally different ways of attending to the world — and that the narrower, analytic way has come to dominate Western culture. Neuroscientists dispute how cleanly that split actually holds.
He argues, across a 2009 book and later work, that the brain's two hemispheres offer fundamentally different ways of attending to the world, and that Western culture has increasingly favored the narrower left-hemisphere mode.
In a 2019 meta-analytic assessment he found little support in current neuroscience for the thesis, and argued it lacks the operational definitions and neural measures that would let evidence count against it.
With Sarah Coakley he co-edited a 2019 special issue of Religion, Brain & Behavior that put the hemisphere thesis in dialogue with neuroscientists, philosophers, and scholars of religion.